The Presumption of Guilt and the Glories of “Stop and Seize”

Michael Salla, Robert O’Harrow Jr, and Steven Rich (The Washington Post) have written an interesting series on asset forfeiture (see the teaser “Civil asset forfeitures more than double under Obama,” by Christopher Ingraham on Wonkblog). The basic presumption of asset forfeiture is simple: you are guilty until proven innocent. If you are the target of “stop and seize,” you bear the burden of proving that your assets were not involved in criminal activity. Even if charges are never filed, you may not get your assets back. And due to the Equitable Sharing Program, state and local authorities have strong financial incentives to take asset forfeiture seriously. What could possibly go wrong?


A few striking facts from the first installment:

  • There have been 61,998 cash seizures made on highways and elsewhere since 9/11 without search warrants or indictments through the Equitable Sharing Program, totaling more than $2.5 billion. State and local authorities kept more than $1.7 billion of that while Justice, Homeland Security and other federal agencies received $800 million. Half of the seizures were below $8,800.
  • Only a sixth of the seizures were legally challenged, in part because of the costs of legal action against the government. But in 41 percent of cases — 4,455 — where there was a challenge, the government agreed to return money. The appeals process took more than a year in 40 percent of those cases and often required owners of the cash to sign agreements not to sue police over the seizures.
  • Hundreds of state and local departments and drug task forces appear to rely on seized cash, despite a federal ban on the money to pay salaries or otherwise support budgets. The Post found that 298 departments and 210 task forces have seized the equivalent of 20 percent or more of their annual budgets since 2008.

According to the Post, asset forfeiture and the incentives created by the Equitable Sharing Program have contributed to more aggressive forms of policing and the use of private security networks. And there is good evidence that the same racial and ethnic biases that are intrinsic to the war on drugs come into play on a routine basis.

NSA collection of data, militarization of police forces, the wide scale practice of “stop and seize”… One does not have to be a cynic to discern a pattern here.

4 thoughts on “The Presumption of Guilt and the Glories of “Stop and Seize”

  1. Unfortunately, one DOES have to be a cynic to see the pattern. Too many people, even if they don’t care for Obama, choose to keep their eyes closed, remaining ignorantly bliss and subscribing to the NIMBY fallacy, convinced it’s not happening to you or me, just the guy behind the tree.

  2. Its amazing how America has slipped back in time to the feudal age. This age occurred when the state,led by the aristocracy,had total control over the property and the fruits of labor of the multitude. They,the feudal aristocracy,under cover of law could take,by force if necessary,what they wanted of the people’s hard earned wealth whenever the state wanted it. In today’s modern America the number of people in the Political Class dependent on the state for their livelihood and existence outnumber,and therefore outvote,the productive Americans in the Economic Class. When either through taxes,borrowing and or money printing the collected revenue is not sufficient to feed the needs of the Political Class the state,who controls the law, now legalizes outright theft to satisfy said needs. Forfeiture laws and Rico Statutes originally designed to go after the ill gained assets of proven criminals are now used to take the property of the average law abiding citizen. This misuse of and misapplication of the law breeds disrespect for the law by the law abiding population and in the end is an important factor in the decline and fall of the American Republic. As the legal process is controlled,by and large, by courts and judges that are part of the Political Class I doubt that there will be much repealing and or reforming of these draconian laws in the near future. Once property rights are destroyed so is your civilized society.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s