Remember the election

The post-election narrative that the media seems to have settled on is that Obama won, so the Republicans should just go along.  Given the narrow margin, they have avoided using the “mandate” word, but they still want to treat the election as if it were a mandate.  None of this is surprising.

But the Republicans members of Congress should remember two important things about this election as they move forward:

First, and most important, they were elected, too.  Every incoming Republican House member won his/her seat, and should govern in Washington in a way consistent with he/she campaigned.  In each district, the voters had an option of choosing a Democrat who would go along with the President’s agenda.  Don’t disrespect the people who just voted for you.

Second, President Obama just won an election where his only strategy was to slime his opponent at every opportunity.  The only thing Obama could ever offer as a plan was raising taxes on the rich, even though returning to Clinton-era taxes on the rich is only a drop in the revenue bucket.  Yes, this would be an anti-growth strategy in the long-run, but only modestly so (there are far more important pro-growth policies that they should concentrate on).

So, why not just let the taxes on the rich go up as Obama wants?  Then in a few months when the debt ceiling debate happens, the Republicans have a particularly strong hand.  They can say, “Gee, Mr. President, we implemented your plan.  Are you ready to level with the American people now how little consequence those tax increases on the rich have for our fiscal future?”

If they oppose the popular tax increases on the rich, they just look like obstructionists.  But giving the President what he wants in the short run reveals his rhetoric as a total sham and gives them a much stronger hand in dealing with the real problem—entitlement reform.

So, can House Republicans be true to the voters who elected them and adopt the strategy I’ve outlined?  I think so.  I think what the voters who voted for those Congressmen wanted was someone who would fight to reign in government.  Taxing people who can afford it a little more is a small price to pay for the larger reward of focusing attention on what matters most.

5 thoughts on “Remember the election

  1. Seeing the details of the President’s proposal, as delivered by Secretary Geithner, it seems to me that he is a terrible negotiator. The old adage that you start high to end high is true, but only insofar as the opening proposal is seen as offered in good faith and clearly signals or implies a desired end point. Now, I can see where the President’s proposal is intended to repel the Republicans into allowing the “fiscal cliff” scenario to play out – but that would be proof of the President’s lack of good faith and sole interest in gaining political advantage over the Republicans at the expense of the country.

    The Republicans, now having been presented with the President’s open, would be best served by rejecting the proposal (done), offering their own counter-proposal (done), and then walk away. Let the Democrats propose a bill in the House for consideration; do nothing else.

  2. There is no way on Heaven or Earth that the the fiscal condition in America can be saved,even if Romney won and the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress.The problem is that the tax,money,banking and government spending systems,that we now have in place,are totally corrupt. In essence what we have is a huge,unwieldy Welfare/Warfare State funded with paper debt money backed by paper bonds whose interest on those bonds is paid for with a communist inspired tax system. The only people benefiting are the Bankers and the Political Class. And the Political Class out number and thus out vote the productive Economic Class. We are faced with a Nation that ran off it’s Constitutional rails decades ago and today is paying the price of that train wreck with the total bankruptcy of our Nation and the loss of what personal Rights we once had. In the end,America took the same path as Rome 2 thousand years ago and will suffer the same decline and fall except at a much more rapid pace.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s