Newt and the State of Conservatism in America

So, is Newt’s SC victory a sign of real support by conservatives (and thus a really sad reflection of the state of conservatism right now given who/what Gingrich is and represents) or a reflection of their simple unwillingness to support Romney’s claim to the nomination?  If the former, I’m depressed.  If the latter, then why the heck didn’t party leaders realize this a lot earlier (premature cognitive closure?  motivated misperception?  miscalculation?) and coax someone else into the race before it was too late to avoid the train wreck ahead: tepid support for a nominee who is dulling the limited government fervor of the moment or the Newtpocalyse.

I don’t think it is the former problem of a changing (dumbing of) conservatism.  I just think many conservatives have deeply internalized the long-running conservative-libertarian argument against Romney (and for some, this is buttressed by a deep suspicion of his Mormon faith) and are flailing about wildly for ABR.  (This also explains conservative flirtations with so many suitors during the campaign season).  However, in the course of doing so, they’ve landed upon a candidate incompatible with the conservative approach and philosophy – and absolutely incompatible with the libertarian-leaning Republican view.  I wonder if some Republicans now wish they had jumped into the seemingly done deal race.

Finally, before we make too much of South Carolina (with many pundits saying it is Romney’s 2008 McCain in NH moment of doom), we should remember that there are a lot of places still to vote in the Republican primary where voters aren’t exactly Gingrich-friendly and a lot of time left for Romney to make the easy case that Gingrich is a nightmare for conservatives and conservatism. 

Myself, I can’t decide if I’d rather have the worst outcomes (Gingrich, Santorum) sunk in favor of the least worst likely outcome (Romney) or for the next-to-impossible but most desirable outcome (Romney and Gingrich split a bunch of primaries with Paul picking up delegates where he can followed by a convention fight where someone like Daniels or Christie emerge as the nominee in a bitterly divided convention).  Since I’m not the marginal voter – and neither are you – my preferences of course don’t matter one bit.  And every Gingrich or Santorum vote will likely lead only to a strengthening of the positions within the Republican Party that I don’t much care for.  So is the most prudent course a libertarian could hope for among the real possibilities a quick Romney victory with Paul hanging around the longest and gathering votes/delegates to wield as a sword?

4 thoughts on “Newt and the State of Conservatism in America

  1. This post seems to suggest that political parties in America actually stand for something, when they are merely loose coalitions of interest groups competing for favors. Romney’s problem is not that he is too liberal or too conservative or too Mormon but that the kind of groups he will grant favors to mostly hail from Democratic Party group of favor seekers – finance, entertainment, tech. The Republican Party group of favor seekers that he appeals to tend to inhabit places that the rest of the Republican party has written off, California, New York, Massachusetts, et al. Romney would have much more success if he ran as a Democrat.

    Newt is not a conservative, in any sense of the word. But he says and does thing that appeal to the favor seekers in the south and in the part of the Republican Party that inhabits the South and to a lesser extent the west – mining, extraction, refining, manufacturing.

  2. I can’t really decide if it’s hilarious or really depressing that the Republican primary seems to have come down to a choice between the career politician who will say anything to win and the ultimate washington insider. So much for small government…

  3. Save for Ron Paul, their all puppets on a string including Obama. The real power behind the throne are the Globalists and New World Order crowd. These groups consist of International Central bankers who can create money out of thin air. Take away that power and these Elitist Globalists would crumble like a bunch of broccoli.Again,save Ron Paul, all the major party candidates have been bought and paid for.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s