Governor Ruger for President?

I stumbled upon this anecdote about Governor Rick Perry of Texas:

Recently Governor Perry allowed his Labrador Retriever to accompany him on his daily six mile jog. While on his run, he and his pet were accosted by a menacing coyote. After remaining still and waiting to see what the wild coyote would do, the governor pulled out a .380 Ruger and shot the coyote dead when it become apparent the coyote was after his pup. 

When he returned to the governor’s office he was queried about his “heartless” actions towards “innocent” animals. After answering more than one question on the matter, and in a mildly exasperated manner he replied, “Don’t go after my dog!”  In other words while the press was confused about his value system, he saw it in very simple terms.

Now, I have no problem with the Guv having a handgun or shooting a “menacing” coyote.  But, seriously, isn’t this story sort of weird?  Wouldn’t running with that kind of heat be a little, um, uncomfortable?  Or, perhaps, he had someone in his entourage carrying it for him (of course running with an entourage sort of takes the romance out of the story: manly governor out running being trailed by a black Suburban filled with his security detail borrows gun to shoot coyote, rather than simply putting the pup in the Suburban for protection).

But the really strange part of this story is that the author uses this anecdote to argue that “Perry has core convictions.”  I don’t know, but I might look for something like standing up to Republican donors who want corporate welfare as an example of having core convictions.  “Willing to shoot annoying wildlife” isn’t quite the “core conviction” I’m looking for.  But that’s just me.

This early in the campaign season, we should all be forgiven for holding uninformed prejudices about candidates (or potential ones in this case).  I haven’t caught the fire for Perry yet, maybe because I know little about him.   So far I know 1) he is handsome, but in a shifty, Clintonesque sort of way; 2) he is from Texas, never a good sign (think: LBJ, W., and all the annoying Texans you have certainly encountered); 3) he packs heat while jogging.

But, as I said, it’s still early.

Addendum: Apparently life imitates art.  A faithful reader (OK, my mother-in-law) sent me this funny comparison between what happens when the governor of California encounters a coyote while jogging and what happens when the governor of Wyoming  encounters the same thing.  This post (from Jan. 5) is so eerily similar to the Perry coyote shooting that I can’t help wonder if some enterprising aid staged the whole thing!  If I were an investigative journalist (or any kind of journalist) I’d try to get to the bottom of this.

7 thoughts on “Governor Ruger for President?

  1. Just curious – “That kind of heat”?

    A .380 Ruger weighs 9.4 oz empty. Now, a classic iPod weighed 4.9 oz. A Sony Walkman cassette player weighed roughly 12 oz.

    Or were you referring to the caliber?

  2. Obviously, you don’t live in Texas.

    Handguns are highly effective for self defense, but only if you actually carry them. People who go through the hassle of getting a concealed carry permit will usually go through the hassle of carrying the weapon as well, even in their gym clothes. Most persons I know with a permit always carry, nearly one hundred percent of the time. The permit is pointless if you aren’t going to bear the weapon.

  3. Actually, you live in Utah with very similar gun laws as Texas. I don’t know about the gun culture. What do your neighbors think of jogging with a handgun?

    1. I live in a college town full of professors who are more likely to shoot off their mouths than a handgun.

      I’m a big supporter of 2nd Ammendment rights and the right to carry. But just because I support the right to bear arms doesn’t mean I generally want to hang out with these people (with a few exceptions, of course).

      From now on I’m going to pay more attention at the gym.

  4. I’m pro-gun rights too but also find it a bit strange to carry while running. I can see the point if you are a soldier in hostile country but is it really appropriate or necessary for the afternoon jog? Doesn’t it hinder the running experience and thus it is worth trading off the extra security (which is hardly necessary in most places) for the better running experience?

    I’m not calling bs and support his right to carry as he sees fit, but the story will almost certainly be thought a tall tale in 200 years even if it is actually true.

    1. “is it really appropriate or necessary for the afternoon jog?”

      The best analogy is the lock on your door. If you really want to keep people out, you keep it locked all the time because you don’t know when someone unwanted may attempt to enter your home. So too with handguns and concealed carry, you don’t know when you will need it so you carry all the time.

      I don’t carry, by the way. I know several who do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s