When it comes to foreign and defense policy, authentic conservatives are wary of utopian schemes, sensitive to the need to husband power, and have an aversion to war. That tends to make them anti-interventionists and to favor the use of force only as a last resort.
Ditto for libertarians. I have a hard time understanding libertarian imperialism. Libertarians, in particular those influenced by British classical liberals, are generally wary of utopian schemes (especially when government is the driver) and appreciate the importance of unintended consequences (ending up harming those we are trying to help, “blowback” in foreign policy, and the rise in the power of the state that correlates with war being three of them). They are also suspicious of social change at the point of a gun. So why aren’t these elements of the libertarian mindset that are continually applied to domestic government intervention also applied to foreign intervention?
HT: Dan McCarthy