I’ve never voted for a Democrat or Republican for president at a general election. I’ve always voted for a Libertarian (in 2008 I voted for George Phillies, who was on the ballot as a Libertarian in New Hampshire in addition to the official candidate, Bob Barr), and I’ve never had reason to regret my vote. [...]
Posts Tagged ‘Supreme Court’
Why “Vote GOP for the Court” Cuts No Ice with Me
Posted in 2012 election, Civil Liberties, U.S. presidential elections, tagged civil liberties, Republican Party, Supreme Court on April 6, 2012 | 8 Comments »
Barnett on the Supreme Court on the Individual Mandate
Posted in Law, tagged Constitution, health care, Supreme Court on September 22, 2010 | 2 Comments »
While my fellow Pilei debate the role that moderate Republicans can play in a future return to fiscal sobriety, libertarian law prof Randy Barnett considers whether, with respect to the PPACA, it even matters. What are the chances that the Supreme Court strikes down the individual mandate, including potentially the entire bill, which lacks a [...]
Coercion as freedom
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged anti-discrimination law, free speech, higher education, law school, Supreme Court on July 1, 2010 | 5 Comments »
In its usual flurry of end-of-term decisions, the Supreme Court issued an important opinion affecting liberty on college campuses (or what’s left of it). The opinion concerned the lawsuit by a Christian group at the Hastings College of Law, a public school affiliated with the University of California. The Christian group was denied the right [...]
What We Can Infer about Kagan
Posted in Law, Uncategorized, tagged Elena Kagan, Supreme Court on July 1, 2010 | 14 Comments »
My Pileus colleague Marcus Cole argued a few weeks ago that conservatives and libertarians should not be so unhappy with Supreme Court Justice nominee Elena Kagan, since it could have been “much worse.” With a left-liberal Democrat in the White House and a Congress controlled by the Democrats, who knows, Marcus asked, what enormity we could [...]
Kagan Could Be Much Worse
Posted in Law, tagged Elena Kagan, Solomon Amendment, Supreme Court on June 9, 2010 | 26 Comments »
Conservative and libertarian opposition to the appointment of Solicitor General and Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan has been lackluster at best, and for good reason: President Obama’s choice to fill the seat of retiring Justice John Paul Stevens could be much worse. Indeed, there is some reason to believe that conservatives ought to breathe a [...]
Souter’s Lame-Brained Judicial Philosophy
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged originalism, souter, Supreme Court on June 3, 2010 | 3 Comments »
Am I the only one perplexed by the embarrassingly lavish praise heaped upon David Souter’s Harvard commencement address by left-liberal commentators? In bashing the notion that judges should rule on the basis of “fair reading” of the law, Souter tries this mind-bogglingly inane reductio ad absurdum: For those whose exclusive norm for constitutional judging is [...]
Don’t Ask Don’t Tell…Don’t Confirm?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Supreme Court on May 11, 2010 | 4 Comments »
The rumor mill is on fire over the nomination of Elena Kagan (what do we know of her sexual preferences? Would she be the first gay Supreme? If so, will she “out” herself in the Senate hearings or once she puts on the robe?). There is an interesting piece on the Moderate Voice by Elijah [...]
So what is second order?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Elena Kagan, gay rights, Military, Moral Philosophy, Supreme Court on May 11, 2010 | 3 Comments »
It has been widely reported that in 2003, Elena Kagan wrote that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy regarding gays in the military was “a moral injustice of the first order.” The first order? Really? Surely there are some implicit qualifiers in there. When you consider genocide, mass rape, sex trafficking, murder, slavery, Jim Crow, [...]
Is she qualified?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Elena Kagan, law school, Supreme Court, tenure on May 10, 2010 | 4 Comments »
My question is not whether Elena Kagan is qualified for the Court. My question is whether she is qualified for tenure at a major law school. When she was made a tenured professor at the University of Chicago, she had (as far as I can tell) only 3 5 publications (see correction below). One of [...]
Is Kagan the Harriet Miers of the Obama Administration?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Elena Kagan, Supreme Court on May 10, 2010 | 3 Comments »
Glenn Greenwald more or less says yes: a blank slate with unclear qualifications. Over at Volokh, Jonathan Adler gives some reasons why Elena Kagan might end up with a tougher confirmation fight than a clear liberal like Diane Wood would have. Note, however, that Adler’s and Greenwald’s reasons are inconsistent. Adler thinks that Kagan is [...]
Around the “internets”
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged COIN, Education Conservatives, Elena Kagan, General James Mattis, Mark Bauerlein, Mike Munger, risk, Supreme Court on April 22, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
1. Mike Munger on the wise urban planners in Toronto. 2. General James Mattis, risk, and counterinsurgency (COIN) 3. Mark Bauerlein on education conservatives 4. Elena Kagan – perhaps the best we can hope for from President Obama?
Is the Personal Health Insurance Mandate Constitutional?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged health care, Judicial Branch, Supreme Court on April 16, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
Randy Barnett at the Volokh Conspiracy has an excellent post on whether the personal health insurance mandate is constitutional in any of three senses of the term. His last point is dead on – if we don’t take the Constitution or the Court’s past rulings seriously when thinking about what the Court will do, we [...]
The Case for Judicial Activism
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged George Will, James Huffman, Judicial Branch, Reason, Supreme Court on April 15, 2010 | 3 Comments »
George Will’s column today in the Washington Post on Supreme Court nominees raises the question of whether conservatives should favor or oppose “judicial activism.” Will argues that “The proper question is: Will the nominee be actively enough engaged in protecting liberty from depredations perpetrated by popular sovereignty?” Fortunately, classical liberals have been interested in just this [...]

