In my last post on this topic, I described an ideal system of federalism and its advantages and disadvantages. One of the concerns that progressives often have about this kind of federalism, which I wish to take seriously, is that it will lead to a growing gap between the incomes of rich and poor regions [...]
Archive for the ‘federalism’ Category
Federalism & Inequality, Part Two
Posted in federalism, growth, inequality, tagged convergence, decentralization, fiscal federalism, growth, inequality on May 8, 2012 | 1 Comment »
Federalism & Inequality, Part One
Posted in federalism, fiscal policies, growth, inequality, tagged Federalism, fiscal federalism, inequality on March 29, 2012 | 7 Comments »
Constitutional debates swirling around the PPACA’s individual mandate have much to do with federalism. The core issue the Supreme Court is addressing is whether the federal government has essentially unlimited authority in economic policy, or whether they are yet some areas of economic policy-making (such as whether to compel commerce) exclusive to the states. As [...]
Could a Scottish Secession Referendum Bring About Salutary Decentralization?
Posted in federalism, Political Science, secession, secession, tagged fiscal federalism, scotland, secessionism, United Kingdom on February 21, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
For all the usual association of independence movements with violence and “separatism,” the fact is that secessionist movements in liberal democracies usually pursue their aims peacefully, through the democratic process, and central governments resolve not to use military force to prevent secession authorized by a democratic vote (imagine that!). Such is the case in Scotland, [...]
Who Killed Local Autonomy in the U.S.?
Posted in federalism, fiscal policies, state politics, tagged decentralization, fiscal federalism, New Deal, states on November 29, 2011 | 3 Comments »
Once upon a time, local governments accounted for the lion’s share of economic policy-making in the United States. Before World War I, not only was the federal government’s economic policy-making activity strictly limited to areas such as international trade, management of federal lands, trust-busting, and food and drug regulation, but state governments themselves were also [...]
Interposition: Part Nine: The Hartford Convention
Posted in Congress, federalism, foreign policy, History, institutions, Law, National defense, political philosophy, representation, secession, secession, state politics on August 18, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Few in power find it convenient to notice inconsistencies in their own conduct. Alas, but President Madison was no exception. Federalism and decentralization exist precisely because free constitutions should not depend on the good graces of those in office, but on the checks necessary to harry them back under the law. Seeking the financial means [...]
Do Politicians Regulate When They Can’t Spend?
Posted in federalism, fiscal policies, institutions, Political Science, Regulation, state politics, tagged Democrats, fiscal policy, regulation, republicans, states on July 22, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Noel Johnson, Matt Mitchell, and Steve Yamarik have a new working paper answering that question in the affirmative. They look at state fiscal and regulatory policies and find that Democrats generally like to increase taxes and spending when in control of state houses and Republicans do the reverse. But when states have tough balanced-budget requirements [...]
Why Do More Conservative States Take More Federal Grants?
Posted in Economics, federalism, fiscal policies, ideologies, Political Science, state politics, tagged federal grants, Ideology, state governments on July 11, 2011 | 10 Comments »
Once you control for everything else, conservative states don’t take more federal grant money than liberal states – in fact, they may even tend to take less.
Interposition: Part Eight: Federalism, Finance and The War of 1812
Posted in federalism, fiscal policies, foreign policy, History, institutions, Law, state politics, Uncategorized on June 28, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
When tensions with England finally began to degenerate into violent altercations, first on the western frontier in such places as Tippecanoe and later along the Great Lakes, the Madison administration decided the time had come to vindicate America’s claims of offended sovereignty. Unsurprisingly, these claims also happened to coincide with popular desires to expand into [...]
Freedom in the 50 States
Posted in federalism, freedom, Political Science, state politics, Uncategorized, tagged freedom, states on June 9, 2011 | 5 Comments »
I’ve just gotten back from a Cato Institute event discussing the new study, Freedom in the 50 States, with my coauthor William Ruger, John Samples, and Michael Barone. I’ll post the video when it’s available. The Mercatus site for the study allows you to download the study and to use a calculator to see how [...]
Interposition: Part Seven: The Embargo and Noncooperation
Posted in federalism, fiscal policies, foreign policy, History, institutions, Law, Public Opinion, Regulation, state politics on June 6, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
With the war in Europe between France and England intensifying, Americans found their rights as neutral traders regularly violated by both French and British navies, and French and British port restrictions further limited American opportunities for commerce. To make matters worse, on numerous occasions, English vessels had boarded American ships and “impressed” many of their [...]
Socialism in One State
Posted in federalism, Political Science, state politics, tagged Federalism, health insurance, vermont on May 9, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Vermont has passed a law authorizing a single-payer, government-run health insurance system. Apparently the plan fails to grasp the fiscal nettle and thus may never come to fruition. Nevertheless, I hope they go forward with it. I don’t think it will work – to the contrary, the experiment should serve as an object lesson to [...]
Interposition:Part Five: Assuming Powers from National Bank to Seditious Libel
Posted in federalism, finance, fiscal policies, History, Law, state politics, tagged delegated powers, Founders, Hamilton, Madison, reserved powers, sedition, states, war on May 5, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Not long after the ratification of the Constitution, Madison came to have serious doubts about his former Federalist friends. Particularly, he came to suspect the sincerity of many who had asserted that the new government would possess only those powers specifically delegated to it. The first disappointment came with Hamilton’s championing of the incorporation of [...]
Interposition: Part Four: New York and the First Act of Interposition
Posted in federalism, History, institutions, Law, political philosophy, secession, state politics on April 22, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
New York was Hamilton’s great project. So closely divided was the state, that at various moments, he despaired of its coming into the union. At one point the Antifederalists offered a compromise. They would support a conditional ratification dependent on the passage of certain key amendments, including the all important construction of delegated and reserved [...]
The Future of Free Cities, Part 2
Posted in Economics, federalism, Political Science, politics, secession on April 11, 2011 | 1 Comment »
In my first post on last week’s “Future of Free Cities” conference, I discussed the legislation Honduras has put forward to authorize the creation of new “free-market cities.” In this second look at the conference, I summarize the discussions and some of the points I came away with. The first talk on the main day [...]
The Future of Free Cities, Part 1
Posted in Economics, federalism, growth, Political Science, tagged decentralization, export processing zones, free cities, free trade, honduras on April 4, 2011 | 2 Comments »
I am currently blogging from Roatán, Honduras, where I am participating in the “Future of Free Cities” conference, sponsored by Universidad Francisco Marroquín. The conference is about the economic and political preconditions for the establishment of free-enterprise zones in developing countries, as well as the internal governance of these territories. In his opening talk last [...]
Interposition:Part Two: Publius and the Federal Check to National Power
Posted in federalism, History, institutions, Law, political philosophy, state politics on March 28, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Among the defenders of the Constitution, a great deal was said about the states as a check to the power of the national government that informed the first ideas about interposition. Madison’s contention in Federalist 39 is well-known. Our union was to be “partly federal and partly national.” Among the premier federal attributes were such provisions as the equal [...]
Interposition: Part One: An Essential Purpose of the States
Posted in federalism, History, institutions, Law, state politics, tagged Federalism, interposition, Maryland Farmer, nullification, Obamacare on March 15, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
A rumble can be heard emanating from assemblies and governor’s mansions across these fruited plains. It is a sound reminiscent of by-gone days that echo down through centuries of constitutional thought. Prompted by everything from unfunded Congressional mandates to the new omnibus healthcare bill, (See here and here) these reverberations strike cords of distant legal memory that [...]
Interposition: The Teeth of Federalism: Introduction
Posted in federalism, History, institutions, Law, state politics on March 14, 2011 | 1 Comment »
The first of a series will begin tomorrow, the Ides of March (the 15th), an appropriate time to initiate an investigation of interposition and federalism in America. On that date in 44 B.C., Julius Caesar was slain for his offences against the Roman Republic. It was a futile act of desperation. The empire was not [...]
Regional Inequality
Posted in Economics, federalism, growth, inequality, tagged convergence, decentralization, economic growth, Federalism, inequality, regionalism on March 14, 2011 | 4 Comments »
The latest Economist has an interesting feature on inequalities among regions within countries. The article compares countries on their ranges in GDP per head (the ratio of richest region to poorest). Thus, we get charts like the following: But range is an extremely crude concept for measuring inequality. In the U.S., the District of Columbia [...]

