If you recall, in March, AG Holder justified the use of drones in “targeted killings” (see related post here). The comments were of interest, in part, because a drone had been used recently to kill Anwar al-Awlaki, a US citizen, in Yemen and in part because Congress was authorizing the expanded use of drones domestically [...]
Archive for the ‘National defense’ Category
The Continuing Saga of Drone Warfare
Posted in foreign policy, National defense on April 26, 2012 | 1 Comment »
A Sea Change on Afghanistan?
Posted in National defense, Public Opinion on March 27, 2012 | 4 Comments »
The long war is hemorrhaging support among the public. As the NYT reports, a new NYT/CBS poll provides some rather striking evidence: The survey found that more than two-thirds of those polled — 69 percent — thought that the United States should not be at war in Afghanistan. Just four months ago, 53 percent said [...]
Holder on the Use of Lethal Force against US Citizens Abroad
Posted in foreign policy, National defense on March 6, 2012 | 11 Comments »
Attorney General Eric Holder gave a speech yesterday at Northwestern Law School on the administration’s policy regarding the targeted killing (not assassination) of US citizens abroad. Full remarks can be found here. Here are a few interesting excerpts. The difference between targeted killings and assassination: Some have called such operations “assassinations.” They are not, and the [...]
Interposition: Part Nine: The Hartford Convention
Posted in Congress, federalism, foreign policy, History, institutions, Law, National defense, political philosophy, representation, secession, secession, state politics on August 18, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Few in power find it convenient to notice inconsistencies in their own conduct. Alas, but President Madison was no exception. Federalism and decentralization exist precisely because free constitutions should not depend on the good graces of those in office, but on the checks necessary to harry them back under the law. Seeking the financial means [...]
Honorable service?
Posted in National defense on July 5, 2011 | 13 Comments »
Will Wilkinson, responding to Michele Bachman, posted yesterday on the unreflective practice of thanking our men and women in service for their service. My view on doing so has gotten harder. I used to differentiate between the government (and military) and the people who serve in it, as is common for those who want to [...]

